The VG279QM also supports HDR, which the VG248QG doesn't, but it doesn't add much because it has a low contrast ratio. However, the PG279Q has a much lower input lag at 60Hz, it has much better out-of-the-box color accuracy, and wider viewing angles. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q is a bit better than the Acer Predator XB273K Pbmiphzx. Higher settings offer faster rise/fall times, but significantly more Driven by data, run by a passionate team of engineers, testers, technical writers, developers, and more. WebASUS VG248QG 24" G-Sync Gaming Monitor 165Hz 1080p 0.5ms Eye Care with DP HDMI DVI. Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available. Additionally, it's G-SYNC compatible, but it's not NVIDIA certified. The on-screen display is very intuitive, easy to navigate, and well-organized. The large, high-resolution screen makes it easier to see more of your work at once. You can download our ICC profile calibration here. The ASUS has much better ergonomics, it's better-built, it gets brighter, and it has much better out-of-the-box color accuracy. The Dell delivers a smoother gaming experience, with much less blur behind fast-moving objects. The Dell S2721DGF is a great choice for media creators. One of thebiggest differences is that the PG279Q has native G-SYNC support while the XG27AQ is simplyG-SYNC compatible. The ASUS, on the other hand, has better ergonomics, supports G-SYNC, and has an optional black frame insertion feature to help improve the appearance of motion. The LG 27GP950-B is slightly better than the Dell S2721DGF. The Dell has significantly better ergonomics because it allows for height and swivel adjustment, as well as rotation to portrait mode. This monitor has very good peak brightness, with no noticeable change in brightness with different content. It has nearly perfect coverage of the standard sRGB color gamut used by the majority of desktop content, but limited coverage of the wider Adobe RGB color gamut. Good peak brightness and great reflection handling. Wetested the Dell 27 Gaming Monitor S2721DGF, which is the only size available. The ASUS has a few extra features for gamers, like a higher 165Hz refresh rate and VRR support, which the BenQ doesn't have. In addition to the Analog Audio Output, it has an audio input, so you can connect an aux cord between your PC and the monitor and use the speakers. Having trouble deciding between two monitors? The Dell also has much better reflection handling, and it gets brighter, so it's a better choice for well-lit rooms. The ASUS VG248QG has okay out-of-the-box accuracy. The back of the monitor is plain, with a simple design and no RGB bias lighting. The 27 inch screen provides a good amount of space for multitasking or gaming, but the 1080p resolution might be too low for some people. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a bit better than the ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q. The Dell, on the other hand, has much better reflection handling and much better ergonomics. The Dell has better ergonomics and wider viewing angles, making it a better choice for sharing content or playing co-op games. The Dell S2721DGF and the MSI Optix G273QF are two 1440p, 165Hz monitors with IPS panels, and the Dell is better for most uses. This monitor doesn't have a local dimming feature. The borders are thin on three sides, but there's a gap between the bezels and the actual screen. It has disappointing accuracy out of the box, but it has a superb SDR color gamut and incredible gradient handling. The ASUS VG248QE and the BenQ ZOWIE XL2411P are very similar overall. It's a great gaming monitor, with low input lag and a fast response time. Enhances contrast and color saturation for lively, vivid visuals ideal for viewing movies. We tested the peak brightness after calibration in the 'Custom Color' Picture Mode with Brightness at its max. However, the 27 inch curved screen offers a good amount of space to open multiple windows, and the stand allows height, swivel, and tilt adjustments, so you can place the monitor on your desk however you prefer. Over HDMI, the monitor supports up to a 144Hz refresh rate, but during testing, the screen would occasionally flash in this mode. For gamers, the BenQ has better a better response time at its max refresh rate, but it doesn't support variable refresh rate technology (VRR). The Acer Nitro RG241Y Pbiipx is much better than the LG 24GL600F for most uses. Gaming-wise, the ASUS performs better because it has significantly faster response times, and it isn't as buggy as the Samsung when it This monitor is bright enough for most rooms, but might not be able to overcome glare in a brightly-lit office. We purchase our own monitors and Monitors store-bought and tested, supported by you via. The VG27VQ has a simple design, similar to other ASUS monitors. The ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A is an impressive gaming monitor that's more well-rounded than its predecessor, the ASUS TUF VG27AQ. This results in much quicker response time for smoother motion. However, the VA panel on the ASUS hasa much better picture quality than the TN panel on the Acer, with a much better contrast ratio, gray uniformity, and black uniformity. It has native FreeSync support to reduce screen tearing, and those with NVIDIA graphics cards can take advantage of the G-SYNC compatibility. On the other hand, the Dell is a better choice if you want to use it in a well-lit room because it has much better reflection handling. so that you can compare the results easily. The backlight on the PG279Q also has the option to introduce flicker to reduce persistence blur. We measured the BFI input lag at 120Hz, and without it, we measured a lag of 5.2 ms, so the BFI increases the lag by about 15 ms. Decent monitor for office use. The LG 24GL600F is a bit better than the Acer GN246HL Bbid for most uses, and is a lot better for gaming. The VG27VQ has an incredibly low input lag. The HP has a higher refresh rate, better ergonomics, and better black uniformity. Like most VA panels, the VG27VQ has a great contrast ratio, resulting in deep blacks when viewed in the dark. However, gamers might prefer the higher refresh rate on the ASUS, and it has a better contrast ratio too, but the response time is much better on the LG, resulting in clearer motion handling. The high refresh rate delivers a nearly perfect response time with almost no motion blur, as well as being flicker-free. Sadly, it doesn't look as good in the dark due to its sub-par contrast ratio and poor black uniformity. The ASUS ROG PG279Q is significantly better than the LG 32GK850G. 23.8-inch Full HD (1920x1080) IPS gaming monitor with fast 144Hz refresh rate designed for professional gamers and fast paced gameplay, Features ASUS Extreme Low Motion Blur (ELMB) Technology with 1ms MPRT to further reduce ghosting and motion blur, FreeSync technology to eliminate screen tearing and choppy frame rates, Features an ergonomically designed stand to offer extensive swivel, tilt, pivot and height adjustments, Shadow Boost enhances image details in dark areas, brightening scenes without over-exposing bright areas, Supports both Adaptive-Sync with NVIDIA GeForce* graphics cards and FreeSync with AMD Radeon graphics cards *Compatible with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 10 series, GTX 16 series, RTX 20 series and newer graphics cards, Full HD(1920 X 1080)@120Hz output on PS5 & Xbox Series X/S. The BenQ ZOWIE XL2411P is much better than the Dell E2220H. This monitor has bad black uniformity. It's limited by its low contrast, so it can't display dark colors, but other than that, it displays colors at different shades well. While both monitors support NVIDIA's G-SYNC technology, the PG279Q has a higher native refresh rate of 144Hz that can easily be overclocked to 165Hz. The Acer has better response times, especially at 60Hz. There's very little variation in brightness with different content, though, which is great. The top of the screen is noticeably darker than the rest, but this is because of the narrow viewing angles and how the image looks worse when viewing from below than from above. VA monitors like the Lenovo D27-30 look much better in a dark room. Its refresh rate is just a bit lower, 165Hz compared to the Gigabyte's 170Hz; however, this is a small difference that isn't noticeable. Pivot +90~-90(clockwise & counterclockwise), TUF Gaming VG249Q Gaming Monitor 23.8 inch Full HD (1920x1080), 144Hz, IPS, Extreme Low Motion Blur, Adaptive-sync, FreeSync,1ms (MPRT), "It's been argued that even pro gamers can't perceive or really benefit from numbers above 240 Hz. It's automatically enabled with HDR and can't be turned off. The ASUSperforms much better in gaming, as it has a lower input lag, a much faster refresh rate, supports G-SYNC VRR, and has lessmotion blur. Like the vast majority of LCD displays, it can't display very bright blues, either. The Samsung has a higher refresh rate and slightly better response time, but the difference might not be noticeablefor most casual players. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q is slightly better than the LG 27GL83A-B. The main difference of the FI27Q-X is that it uses a 240Hz panel compared to 165Hz on the FI27Q. The Dell is a desktop monitor with a high-resolution screen and excellent ergonomics. However, the LG's TN panel has a better response time and higher peak brightness. The coverage of the sRGB color space is outstanding. There's significant clouding throughout the screen, and some light bleeds in the corners (commonly called IPS glow). Update 02/15/2022: The HDMI port is limited to HDMI 1.4 bandwidth, not HDMI 2.0. The MSI is a desktop fixed gaming monitor with a high refresh rate and advanced gaming features. After a few years of use in the office, the A on the ASUS logo on the front of the monitor has gone missing, as you can see here. The winners - Ryzen 7 2700X, Geforce RTX 2070. The Acer has a slightly higher refresh rate of 170Hz next to the Dell's 165Hz, but the difference is small and shouldn't be noticeable to most people. Great peak brightness in SDR. On the left hand side in the tree of Display settings (see below and click to enlarge), you should see a 'Set up G-Sync' option. The ASUS VG248QG 24 has a backlight strobing feature, commonly known as black frame insertion, to reduce persistence blur. The ASUS has better motion handling due to its quick response time, but motion still doesn't look great on it. Ideal settings for viewing photos and graphics online. The PG279Q has better motion handling, with an even faster response time that produces almost no noticeable motion blur. The Dell S2721DGF is much better than the AOC CQ27G2 for most users. It also has low input lag for a responsive gaming experience. Although the Dell has a higher refresh rate and lower input lag, casual gamers might not notice the difference. It also has better picture quality with its great out-of-the-box color accuracy and better contrast ratio. The low-resolution screen means you'll spend more time scrolling or zooming your work, and the image degrades at an angle, so it isn't great for sharing your screen with colleagues or clients. Excellent out-of-the-box color accuracy for the ASUS PG279Q. It's a versatile monitorwithgreat reflection handlingand a high peak brightness in SDR, so glare isn't an issue in a bright room. The Dell has a higher refresh rate of 165Hz, compared to the Gigabyte's 144Hz, and it has a much faster response time, resulting in a clearer image with less ghosting. The XL2411 (non "P") is a different monitor, with slightly different connectors. Our unit was manufactured in June 2021, and you can see the labelhere. This might vary a bit between units. The VG279QM has much better ergonomics, better viewing angles, and significantly faster response time. The ASUS works best when paired with an NVIDIA graphics card, whereas the MSI works best with an AMD card or Xbox One. There are some font issues in apps that don't support ClearType. The ASUS Swift PG279Q can add optional flicker that matches the input rate using NVIDIA's ULMB feature. The BenQ has an optional black frame insertion feature, though, but motion still looks better on the ViewSonic. The 23.8-inch Full HD (1920 X 1080) IPS panel of TUF Gaming VG249Q delivers stunning visuals from all angles with wide 178-degree viewing angles ensure minimal distortion and color shift even when you're viewing from extreme positions. See our recommendations for the best gaming monitors, thebest 27 inch monitors,andthe best budget gaming monitors. The PG279Q has much better viewing angles and an optional black frame insertion featurefor even clearer motion. If you're looking for a 240Hz monitor with an even better response time, check out the LG 27GN750-B, or the 280Hz ASUS VG279QM. The all-plastic construction feels solid, and even though there's some flex to the bezels and back panel, it's nothing to worry about. The VG248QG also has much better ergonomics with a wider swivel range, and you can rotate the screen into portrait mode in either direction. If you're often in a well-lit room, the Acergets a bit brighter than the LG, but the LG has better reflection handling. We used the sRGB mode, which has some inaccuracies to most colors and the white balance. Update 11/25/2021: We increased the text clarity score from 7.0 to 7.5 for consistency with other similar displays. The ASUS is a portable gaming monitor with a smaller screen and a lower native resolution. It's made entirely out of a solid black plastic. Also, the ASUS has better viewing angles, which is great if you wish to use it at the office. Good peak brightness and impressive reflection handling. The ASUS ROG PG279Q is better than the Acer Predator XB271HU Bmiprz. If you want a similar display with much better viewing angles, check out the Dell S2421H instead. See also our recommendations for the best gaming monitors, thebest budget gaming monitors, and the best 1080p monitors. Some people may prefer the LG for gaming, as it supports FreeSync variable refresh rate technology and has a flicker-free backlight. The ASUS ROG PG279Q is a significantly better monitor than the HP OMEN 27 in almostevery use. The Dell S2419HGF is slightly better than the BenQ ZOWIEXL2411P. It covers the sRGB color space used in most content well, but not as good as most monitors. The S2721DGF may represent a better value to some people. The Dell also has wide viewing angles. At the same time, anyone who sits next to you will enjoy the same picture quality even while looking from the side, so you can demonstrate your work nicely. A distinct problem with TN panels is how the vertical viewing angles are worse from the bottom than the top. The Dell 27 Gaming Monitor S2721DGF is great for gaming. The ASUS VG248QG 24 has low input lag for a responsive gaming experience. It has a wide swivel range, and you can rotate it into portrait mode in either direction, both of which are a nice addition to a budget-friendly monitor. We purchase our own monitors and 'High' has a noticeably faster response time, but there is significant overshoot in most transitions, and 'Premium' is even worse. Build quality is better on the ASUS, and it has a more accurate color reproduction out-of-the-box. We recommend the 'Off' setting. The viewing angles are poor, so it's not an ideal monitor if you need to share your screen with coworkers. The LG has an optional black frame insertion feature, but overall, motion handling is very similar between the two. It performs much better than the Dell S2421H. Both monitors have an excellent 144Hz refresh rate, although the Dell has to be overclocked to get there. The FI27Q uses an RGB sub-pixel layout, which may render text more clearly than the FI27Q-X in certain programs because not all programs can display content in a BGR sub-pixel layout. On the other hand, the BenQ supports HDR, but it doesn't have a black frame insertion feature, which the ASUS has. Vote for the next monitor we buy. However, in bright rooms, it gets bright enough to fight glare and has impressive reflection handling. The monitor diffuses reflections across the screen, which helps to reduce their intensity. ROG Swift PG279QM. This shouldn't cause any issues for most people, though. Due to the low contrast ratio, it can't display dark, saturated colors very well, and colors aren't quite as bright as pure white. No cherry-picked units sent by brands. The ASUS PG279Q has a very good QHD native resolution and a fairly large 27" size, which are great for almost any use. WebASUS VG248QG Gaming Monitor - 24, Full HD, 0.5ms*, overclockable 165Hz (above 144Hz),G-SYNC Compatible, FreeSync Premium. On the other hand, if you're playing a lot of HDR games, the Samsung CHG70 should be your choice as it supports HDR and will offer a decent HDR gaming experience. The Lenovo Legion Y27q-20 and the Dell S2721DGF are very similar overall. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q and the ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ are both excellent gaming monitors from ASUS's Republic of Gamers brand. The review incorrectly stated that the HDMI port supports HDMI 2.0 bandwidth. The ASUS has a faster refresh rate that makes motion look smoother, and better ergonomics to help you place it comfortably on your desk. The 24GL600F supports FreeSync variable refresh rate technology, for a nearly tear-free gaming experience. The Samsung has HDMI 2.1 inputs that allow you to play 4k games up to 120 fps from consoles, and it has a completely flicker-free backlight. The Extreme option is a bit faster, but it adds some terrible overshoot, so we don't recommend it. The LG UltraGear 24GL600F doesn't support HDR. The great ergonomics allow you to easily position it in any way you like. The Dell S2721DGF and the ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQ perform very similarly gaming-wise. Motion looks better on the PG279Q due to the faster response time and the optional Black Frame Insertion feature. The PG279Q uses an IPS panel, which has much wider viewing angles and has a higher native resolution. The VG27WQ1B has a 1440p resolution against the VG27VQ's 1080p, it supports HDR, has a quicker response time, and better reflection handling. The ASUS VG248QG and the Gigabyte M27Q are different types of gaming monitors, but the M27Q is much more versatile. It has a stand with fantastic ergonomics that make it easy to adjust the screen, but it has narrow viewing angles. The ASUS also has much better motion handling thanks to the quicker response time, especially at 60Hz, and it has better ergonomics thanks to the wider swivel range. The Dell S2721DGF is better than the BenQ EX2780Q overall. No cherry-picked units sent by brands. The TUF supports FreeSync variable refresh rate (VRR) technology, while the ROG supports G-SYNC VRR. ProArt Display PA278QV. Gaming-wise, the Samsung performs better mainly because it has a much higher refresh rate,240Hz compared to the Dell's 165Hz. Unlike the ASUS TUF VG27AQ, this monitor doesn't support ELMB-SYNC, so BFI can only be enabled if FreeSync is disabled. Gamma doesn't follow the sRGB target curve very well, and most scenes are too bright. It has a disappointing tilt range, no height adjustment, and no swivel function, so it might be difficult to place in an ideal viewing position. Finally, the LG has a higher refresh rate and slightly lower input lag. The BenQ gets brighter, but the ASUS has better reflection handling, so they both perform well in bright rooms. Both monitors have an excellent refresh rate of 144Hz, even though the Dellhas to be overclocked to get there. The PG279Q has slightly better black uniformity and supports NVIDIA's G-SYNC variable refresh rate technology. The 24", 1080p screen might be a bit small for most people, but it's great if you have a limited amount of space. The BenQ has much better ergonomics and a flicker-free backlight. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q and the ViewSonic Elite XG270QG are two very similar monitors. The Acer X27 has a higher native resolution, at 4k, that allows you to see more details or multitask easier. It wasn't possible to completely correct the color inaccuracies, but gamma is much closer to the target curve, and the white balance is almost perfect. The Dell S2721DGF has a superb SDR color gamut, with complete coverage of the sRGB color space used by most current desktop and web content, including games. Windows 11 Home, Device comes with Windows 10 and a free Windows 11 upgrade or may be preloaded with Windows 11. TN panels are known to have narrow viewing angles, and this one is no exception. The ASUS is a simple portable monitor designed for extra productivity on the go. The Dell has amore versatile stand that allows many adjustments so you can place it in a comfortable position with ease and can also serve as a USBhub. The ASUS VG248QG 24 has decent gray uniformity. Excellent SDR color volume. The 32GN650-B is a gaming monitor with a high 165Hz refresh rate, 1440p resolution, and significantly higher response time for smooth gaming. The Dell is also much more versatile, with a better stand that's easier to adjust to an ideal viewing position, and it has better connectivity, with a built-in USB hub so you can easily connect your peripherals to your PC. There's clouding throughout, and the screen looks blue due to the low contrast. The ASUS VG248QG has a few extra features to improve the user experience, including: There's a joystick and four buttons on the back right side to control the on-screen menu. The low resolution, relatively small screen isn't great for multitasking. The LG 24GL600F works well with recent MacBooks. The BenQ ZOWIE XL2411P has an excellent native refresh rate, but it doesn't support any of the variable refresh rate technologies, like AMD's FreeSync. The LG 24MP59G-P and the LG 24GL600F use different panel technologies, each with their strengths and weaknesses. The LG UltraGear 24GL600F-B is an okay 24", 1080p monitor with a TN panel. Unfortunately, it doesn't support any variable refresh rate technologies, and the 1080p resolution might disappoint some gamers. This can vary between units, though, so let us know in the discussions below if your unit shows signs of image retention. On the other hand, the LG is more accurate out of the box. It has excellent ergonomics and an amazing horizontal viewing angle, so you can easily share the screen with clients or colleagues. Amazing refresh rate. The Dell S2721DGF has great reflection handling. TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A. There are some noticeable inaccuracies in most colors and in brighter shades of gray, and the color temperature is a bit cool. so that you can compare the results easily. It comes with the same square-based stand that we normally see on ASUS monitors. It's an updated version of the ASUS VG248QE with a few upgrades, such as a higher 165Hz refresh rate and variable refresh rate (VRR) support. See also our reviews for the best budget gaming monitors, thebest gaming monitors under $200, and thebest gaming monitors. We don't expect our review to be valid for it. WebBuy ASUS VG278QR 27 Gaming Monitor 165Hz Full HD (1920 x 1080) 0.5ms G-SYNC Eye Care DisplayPort HDMI You can access and select four different filter settings onscreen easily through the OSD menu or DisplayWidget UI to find the best one that suits the task at hand. The response time at 60Hz is excellent, but there's more motion blur than at its max refresh rate. It has an outstanding response time at the max refresh rate, the backlight is completely flicker-free, and it has outstanding low input lag. The ViewSonic has a faster response time, resulting in clearer motion with almost no noticeable blur behind fast-moving objects. It also has significantly better ergonomics because it can swivel and rotate to portrait mode, and it supports HDR. They're both 1440p monitors with a native 144Hz refresh rate, but the ASUS can be overclocked to 165Hz. The backlight of the 24GL600F-B is normally completely flicker-free, so there are no noticeable duplications. There are some minor signs of temporary image retention after displaying a high-contrast static image, but it disappears quickly. The VG27VQ has a great color gamut. Motion looks smooth thanks to the quick response time with minimal overshoot on the recommended '40' overdrive setting. The stand is bulky, but supports the monitor well and there is very little wobble. There's a small amount of vertical color bleed, but this shouldn't cause any issues. The ASUS VG248QG is decent for most uses. On the other hand, the VG27VQ has a much better contrast ratio, so it looks better in a dark room. The response time at 60Hz on the VG27VQ is decent and it's better than the response time at its max refresh rate. From above there's no inversion, but the image washes out very quickly. The AD27QD supports HDR, has much better gradients, and supports AMD's FreeSync technology with both AMD cards and NVIDIA's new FreeSync compatible drivers, making it a slightly more versatile choice if you have a 10- or 20- series NVIDIA GPU. The ASUS ROG PG279Q is a much better monitor than the Samsung CF791. The Dell S2721DGF and the LG 27GN800-B perform very similarly gaming-wise. The S2721DGF has much better reflection handling and better ergonomics, but the AW2721D feels better built, gets significantly brighter in SDR and HDR, and has much better accuracy out-of-the-box, although this can vary between units. If viewing angles are important to you, check out the ASUS VG246H instead. It also has a 24 inch screen with a 1080p resolution, which is good enough for most gamers, but some people may find it too small for productivity. The contrast ratio is great, resulting in deep blacks, but the poor black uniformity is visible when watching dark scenes. The ASUS has much better out-of-the box color accuracy, better ergonomics, and a better contrast ratio. WebAnd you can clearly see this in our results as ASUS takes Best Gaming Monitor Brand with 26% of the votes, while Prism+ is much further behind at 15%. The ASUS-exclusive, integrated GamePlus hotkey offers in-game enhancements that help you get more out of your game. It includes a USB-C port that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode, an integrated KVM switch, and a Picture-in-Picture/Picture-by-Picture mode that lets you display two input signals simultaneously, which can be useful for streamers running on two computers. Unlike many recent gaming monitors, there's no option to add crosshairs, which might be a bit disappointing. The ASUS has a faster response time, but the Gigabyte has HDR support. Keep in mind that the BFI scoring is based on the flicker range and not the actual performance. It supports a black frame insertion (BFI) feature that helps improve the overall appearance of motion and can also deliver more uniform The Dell S2721DGF is much better than the MSI Optix G272. This monitor is a bit thicker than most similar models we've tested, so it takes up a bit more space when not VESA mounted. The ASUS looks better in a brighter room, and it has much better viewing angles. It supports NVIDIA's G-SYNC variable refresh rate technology for a nearly tear-free gaming experience, and it has an optional black frame insertion feature. It also has significantly better ergonomics and USB ports. Its performance should please most gamers, as it has incredible motion handling and has low input lag for a responsive gaming experience. The Dell has a higher refresh rate anda faster response time, which results in a smoother and more responsive gaming experience. This monitor has been replaced by the PG279QZ, which is a minor revision. The VG27VQ has great out-of-box color accuracy. The ASUS ProArt PA148CTV and the MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD are very different products with different intended uses, so the results aren't really comparable.
Spanish Finger Food Crossword, Reciprocal Agreement Countries, Pilates Reformer Upright Storage, Harvard Tennis Membership, Enterprise Risk Management And Strategic Planning,